Awaiting reviewer invitation after minor revision example. I know some editors do it once a month or every K months.

Awaiting reviewer invitation after minor revision example The status after 3 days . ’ Mar 13, 2022 · It has been 1. Publish after minor revision, appropriate to select if you believe only simple revisions are necessary to make the manuscript worthy of publication. a) Is it possible to be rejected at this point? After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. e. These revisions were trivial, and so I resubmitted after one week. Further, an editor may not carry out his/her duties every day. A minor revision usually means that only textual changes are needed. But my question is as below. I know some editors do it once a month or every K months. From my own experience I once reveiced in a row major revision, minor revision, major revision. Jun 24, 2023 · After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. I had submitted a manuscript to a Q2 medicine journal via ScholarOne’s Manuscript Central. According to the publishing office, they can’t find a reviewer. Finally, the status now is awaiting final decision since a week. Feb 26, 2021 · After almost three weeks of being in Awaiting Reviewer Assignment, the status has changed to Awaiting Reviewer Selection. 3. The status changed to awaiting reviewer selection, and then changed to awaiting reviewer scores. Please note the timeframe: you must respond to the invitation within three (3) days and complete the review within ten (10) days. After some days, the status changed to 'awaiting reviewer scores', but there is also the status 'awaiting decision' right next to it. The Peer Review in Progress. We sent the manuscript with minor revision but now it is again under revision for 15 days. I have emailed the editor several times, but I still have not received any response. This means that the submission needs some minor work (as recommended by the reviewer) but 2. Since 7/27 the status of my manuscript is awaiting reviewer invitation. revision recommendation. This change has occurred Aug 25, 2020 · Hi. ) Keep in mind that neither a major nor a minor revision are approving the paper as is. Manuscripts quite often return to this stage if not enough of the invited reviewers accepted the invitation so further invitations need to be sent. Feb 17, 2021 · Later, it has been under "Awaiting review scores" for the past 25 days. After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. If you review a manuscript and struggle to formulate your feedback to reflect a ‘minor revisions’ verdict, look no further: get inspired by explanations, sample comments and examples! Contents When to decide on ‘minor revisions’ A third reason for inviting new referees might be a reject from the final reviewer after your minor revision (assuming the editor had send it out again). Sep 29, 2022 · Smile执着 2022-08-07 Dear experts, may I ask if a new reviewer has been assigned in this situation? The article's status is currently R0: Revise and Resubmit; R1: Accept As Regular Paper After Minor Revision; R2: Awaiting Reviewer Assignment. To send reminders, follow these steps: In your Editor Main Menu, select ‘ Send Reminder Letters ’. ” I had this with one paper (Medical Care) and I think I had two of these rejections before the minor formatting revision pre-acceptance (longest submission process in my career; one year from first submission to acceptance). When the status changes to "Under Review", the manuscript is with reviewers Note that the review process at BLC is single-anonymous. What can this mean? The platform is scholarone. If AE would like to recommend for a minor revision when a manuscript still has a major Aug 25, 2021 · I have a paper which was invited to be resubmitted after minor revisions. 20 awaiting AE recommendation, awaiting EIC decision, minor revision 22. " Then it changed to "Awaiting reviewer assignment" What does it mean? Will my paper be reviewed again? It is quite normal for a revised paper to be reviewed once again. PEER REVIEW EXCELLENCE ONLINE COURSE You should check this before writing your reviewer report. Apr 27, 2023 · After the second round of review, the editor provided some minor language revisions, and all three reviewers had no further comments. Reviewer assignments (i. However, today, it changed back to Awaiting Referee Scores. " Related reading: Why does my manuscript's status keep changing from "awaiting reviewer selection" to "awaiting reviewer assignment"? Accept – almost never given to an initial submission, this is usually given to a strong paper after 1-2 rounds of revision. They then accept or decline the invitation to review. The review will assess the comprehensiveness of the paper's background and its impact in the field. Now I am curious about what this might mean. This change has occurred A positive response may be more likely if you tailor the invitation to the reviewer; If there is a specific reason why you are inviting them, then include a note on this toward the beginning of the invitation. 16 awaiting Editor-in-Chief decision, 22. Conflicts of interest may include relationships with academic advisors and/ Jan 31, 2024 · The status "Awaiting Referee Report" implies that the reviewers are already assigned and review work is in-progress. 29 submitted after [email protected] Submitted my paper. 7. • Is this article in your area of expertise? Review the article’s title and abstract in the review invitation letter to evaluate whether the topic is a good fit for you. After 4 days, it changed to "awaiting reviewer scores". After three weeks, I would consider asking for an update (I have edited the answer based on your updated precisions) – Aug 4, 2021 · After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Language correction - Invitation to revise and resubmit On the Reviewer Main Menu, click on "New Reviewer Invitations. . 17 major revision 22. It should take at least a few weeks for re-review and the editor to make a decision after your revision is submitted (if the previous decision was B (minor revisions), then the timelines may be shorter). blogspot. The reviewer sets time aside to read the paper several times. After another month, I got back the review, asking to work on minor revisions. Once you receive a review invitation, please respond at your earliest convenience even if you cannot review. And until now, the status has not changed for two months. And from the past few days, I see it as "Awaiting AE recommendation". 2) Decline an invitation to review if there is a conflict of interest with one of the authors. The manuscript is likely to be accepted after authors address requests for revision that do not involve major re-working of the data analysis and presentation or of the organization and text of the manuscript. This change has occurred Editor of a journal asked for "Major Revision" for a submitted paper, after submitting revised paper it went for the review, after that the status shows "with Editor" for some time. I have received minor comments (only a few text corrections) from the referee who suggested major revision at the 1st review. Awaiting EA (Associated Editor) decision. These would include perhaps only one major suggestion in the written review and several minor suggestions. At first, the status showed "awaiting AE recommendation". The five allowable Editorial decisions are: Feb 15, 2023 · As an editor, I can tell you getting a reviewer let alone a competent reviewer is difficult. I revised the paper accordingly and addressed the feedbacks. There were 3-4 little modifications required by referees. But now, three weeks have passed and Apr 21, 2017 · Review complete: This is the largest variance part because some reviewers agree to review but don’t actually submit one, some reviewers decline, some reviewers never respond to the invitation, and so on. I emailed, the editor sent a reminder, and the review then came back very quickly. "Awaiting reviewer invitation" should strictly be a very brief status, since the time between the editor deciding to invite reviewers and the editor actually inviting reviewers should be very brief, on Feb 18, 2022 · Awaiting Reviewer Invitation This means that potential reviewers have been selected, but have yet to be invited. same "review complete" status but different date. Awaiting Reviewer Scores Nov 23, 2022 · The first reviewer has explicitly stated that they are satisfied with the changes made. Jan 8, 2021 · I submitted a minor revision for my paper based on the comments by the editor and Reviewers 1 and 2. Some days after the manuscript was published online, a researcher wrote me and asked for the full text. My personal guideline was to invite new reviewers if the previous reviewer had gone seven days without answering the invitation. 05 awaiting reviewer assignment 22. An example of a single major item that might lend itself to an overall minor revision Apr 21, 2020 · I submitted a manuscript to BMJ Open about a month ago and have checked status every day. So if the editor started to search for an additional reviewer after receiving the first two reviewer reports, everything seems quite in time. This gives us the ability to • Assign Reviewers: Manuscripts awaiting responses from invited reviewers. Mar 15, 2016 · A rejected paper is sometimes resubmitted to the same journal, after some revisions. Feb 14, 2023 · After a week of submission, the status changed to "awaiting reviewer selections". The The revision can be minor, moderate, or major, and this is usually indicated in the decision letter and/or the manuscript status in the submission system. However, the status has been "awaiting reviewer selection" for the last 3 weeks. 编辑部或审稿人正在审稿，前者对稿件录用倾向做预期评估。 Jan 31, 2024 · The minimum would be either two or three depending on the publication but the associate editor might have sent a few more invitations around. Sep 20, 2017 · It typically means that the paper has been received, has been put in the work queue of the editor, but the editor has not assigned reviewers. Jul 31, 2021 · Hello, I submitted my paper to one of the high impact factor journals month ago. In the case of major revisions, the manuscript does go back to the same reviewer who reviewed your manuscript the first time. I am not If the status of the manuscript is shown as "With Editor", the manuscript is either awaiting in- house evaluation or is awaiting the assignment of reviewers. Now, again it Jan 7, 2019 · I have a paper on an Elsevier journal with "accept, minor revision". This change has occurred Jul 18, 2019 · I have made a major revision after receiving one very positive feedback and one very negative feedback for my manuscript. 2. 对于论文小修后出现"awaiting reviewer assignment"的情况，通常并不会直接返回给原来的审稿人来审稿。原因有以下几点：1. The Review Form and associated documents are available via the reviewer’s CCS Chemistry ScholarOne Manuscripts Reviewer enter. uk has a great post or two about why review can take so long Review was on time: The review was returned by the agreed due date, which is 3 weeks, if applicable, plus the approved extension from the day the reviewer responded to the review invitation. Related reading: What does a status change from "Awaiting reviewer score" back to "Awaiting reviewer assignment" mean? Aug 16, 2024 · Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: Potential reviewers have been identified, and the editor is in the process of assigning them to review your manuscript. 査読者への依頼待ち. " At the 1st review, the referees' have written positive statement. The third reviewer wants me to completely re-write every section of the article. 审稿人可能暂时不可用：原审稿人有 (2) Accept after minor revision (no further review): At least one reviewer recommends “Accept after minor revision (no further review)”, and no “Reconsider (re-review) after major revision” or “Reject” is recommended. A few days ago, it was changed to "awaiting reviewer selection". A reviewer is just a random sample of your future readers. Is this normal? For the record, the time from initial submission to the revise and resubmit decision was 10 weeks, but 3 weeks of that time it was sitting on the editor’s desk awaiting her decision. Is switching a reviewer after minor revision common? If so, would new comments be added by a new reviewer that were not included in the first review? Nov 21, 2022 · After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Or (in one system I know of), that the editor has not assigned the necessary number of reviewers. However, I definitely remember the last two: from "awaiting reviewer recommendations" to "awaiting final decision". Normally, the editor decides the outcome after this. I am not After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. After the review scores come back, a manuscript then Jun 23, 2023 · Recently, as a student, I received a review invitation from JPD. 17 Accepted asdfg12123 2022-02-04 revision again. AU AE — AU submits a revision to AE, within five weeks for a minor/moderate revision, eight weeks for a moderate revision, and 10 weeks for a moderate/major revision. 07. Note that the time it takes for an editor to make a decision on your revision may vary depending on the editor's workload and the time of year. However, the third reviewer has given almost 4 pages of revisions. Language correction - Invitation to revise and resubmit. I submitted the revised manuscript after one-and-a-half months. MINOR REVISION Minor revisions are typically changes that might take the author a day or two to incorporate in the manuscript. Then I revised and resubmitted the paper. If you intend for the reviewers to verify the revisions, you should NOT choose Minor Revision. Is it possible to get a desk reject after the "awaiting reviewer selection" stage? Apr 9, 2023 · I submitted an article to a certain top IEEE transaction journal, and after a year and a half of peer review, it was finally rejected. I for example look at my assignments once a week. As well, in one of the raw data source tabl [email protected] Submitted my paper. Especially if you are unsure about how to formulate your feedback. It means that the peer reviewer considers a manuscript suitable for publication if the authors rectify some major shortcomings. If the reviewer did not catch the novelty of your approach, you should have highlighted it more. Nov 12, 2018 · The status "Awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editor has sent out reviewer invitations. Awaiting Reviewer Assignment. One of the referee suggested minor revision, while the other suggested major revision. I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again After 6 weeks I got a decision to reject it though the editor-in-chief acknowledged that the peer review was positive!! in fact the two peer reviewers had only minor comments that should have led Nov 24, 2021 · After revising and resubmit an article (the first peer review result was "minor revisions"), the status changed after 3 weeks to "Awaiting Decision". Reviewer Videos: Since then it has been 4 months and the paper is still 'awaiting reviewer invitation'. In the case of a Revision decision, it would also include your view of essential enhancements the authors must make or any other particular issues related to the paper. Nov 4, 2024 · The ‘Reviewer Invited – No Response Report’ lists Reviewers who haven’t responded (i. 12. Choose Major Revision if a paper has real potential, but a large component should When presented with an invitation to review a manuscript: 1) Let the editor know if your expertise and/or fields of interest cover the topic of the manuscript. However, I just noticed that the status of my revised manuscript is now "awaiting reviewer selection". 05. The editor has termed it as 'minor' revision. So, please give me advice. 22. AE decides if a full review by reviewers is necessary after a moderate revision. After submitting the revised article for a week, a ADM was assigned and the status has changed to "awaiting reviewer invitation. 编辑已接手处理，正在邀请审稿人中。 7. Peer-reviewing an academic manuscript is not an easy task. example of cover page for assignment; how to write a cover letter for delivery driver; to do or make a speech; what does assignment mean in education; explaining What do reviewers look for? This will vary from title to title, for example a journal with a strong research focus will put more emphasis on research methodology, while journals publishing case studies will focus on the quality of the case and accompanying teaching note. 编辑很快做出决定。若未经审稿人评审（letter或correspondence除外），稿件几乎都会被拒绝。 6. In general, a paper is recommended for minor revision when all reviews are either accept or minor revision. 5. For instance, they will earth be however to plan the manuscript to perform tasks such as Select, clause are interactions that quote only be performed by the AE to foster communication between the AE and the reviewer and please the AE and the author. This is a placeholder queue that does not require check these manuscripts periodically • Awaiting Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where reviewers have agreed to review, but have not submitted their review Overdue Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where Jun 7, 2022 · 22. Has anyone had this experience If the AE would like to recommend for a minor revision when a manuscript still has a major revision review, the AE needs to elaborate on the recommendation and discuss this with the EiC. Even yesterday the status was still "awaiting reviewer selection", but today it was changed to "awaiting EIC decision". 06 awaiting reviewer scores. Minor Revision – Rarely given to a first round submission unless it is just a sparkling and near-perfect paper. From your text, it apparently seems it has passed initial screening. The review deadline given was 15 days, with only four possible outcomes: major revision, minor revision, acceptance, or rejection. Is this not backwards? Thank you, Sara With a typical ScholarOne configuration, "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" means that it is actually out with (at least some) reviewers, while "Under Review" would instead mean the previous stage, where it is being considered by the handling editor(s) and might still be rejected without review. Examples of reviewer comments can help!Here you can find an overview of sample comments and examples for the most common review decisions: ‘minor revisions’, ‘major revisions’, ‘revise and resubmit’ and ‘reject’ decisions. Now what? Feb 18, 2022 | Scholarly publishing. On the occasion that a reviewer withdraws from the process, the Editorial Team will begin the reviewer selection process again. 03. I reviewed a paper on acoustic absorption and gave Apr 2, 2023 · A few weeks ago, we (2 authors) published a hypothesis paper in the medical sciences. In this case, however, the status went back to under review after I resubmitted. 40 days later, I received a decision letter suggesting minor revision, after which I made the suggested changes and submitted again. (To be sure, the kinds of minor revisions I've suggested may also be necessary as part of a broader slate of major revisions for an article. After a short time, the status of the manuscript changed to ‘Reviewer selection,’ then ‘Reviewer assignment’, then ‘Reviewer selection’, and then ‘Reviewer assignment’ again. Major Revision: The manuscript may be accepted with major revisions. Recommendation can also be "get reviewer to clarify" so it goes back to the review cycle. Under review. 08. Choose Minor Revision when you feel the paper should be accepted after slight revisions. What is the decision process for a typical paper? Nearly all papers fall into one of three categories: i) Rejected without review (as described above), ii) Rejected after review, and iii) a Major Revision followed by a Minor Revision followed by Accept. 18 As a rule of thumb, minor revision leads to a quick acceptance, usually without sending the paper back to reviewers; however, this depends on how well the editor does his/her job and Illness Awaiting reviewer assignment after minor revision. As for a ‘Minor revision’ decision you should provide appropriate edited, comprehensive, coherent, non-conflicting comments to enable the author(s) to consider whether to re-submit. Should I Awaiting Reviewer Invitation. Awaiting Reviewer Invitation: The identified Jul 16, 2019 · Anyone give me some advice: I have made a major revision after receiving one very positive feedback and one very negative feedback for my manuscript. Choose “Moderate revision” if AE wants to give the authors more time to revise. 2. After getting a moderate revision for the manuscript and resubmitting it, it is possible to get moderate revision again, or minor revision, or accept directly without any further edits. The status has not changed to ‘Under review’. How should this double status be interpreted? Is the revised manuscript with the editor or reviewers, or both? Mar 5, 2019 · In short, the switching of the status repeatedly from “awaiting reviewer selection” to “awaiting reviewer assignment” and back implies that the editor is having a hard time finding reviewers for your paper. After [I resubmitted for] a major revision (which took two months), the status was Awaiting Referee Scores. after a 2nd revision) may not require any editorial summary. " This will help you decide whether you are able to review the manuscript. 01 awaiting reviewer invitation 22. To request extensions for revisions. I took this to mean that the paper has passed the desk review, since the editor is selecting reviewers. Maybe in couple of weeks period, you might get email(s) about major/minor revision of the manuscript. I suppose that in most cases (of minor revision), the revised manuscript will only be reviewed by the ADM or associate editor. Did the editor find new reviewers for me? If a reviewer who agreed to volunteer their time is no longer available or responsive, please feel free to reach out to a new reviewer. There is no need for anonymising the manuscript upon Potential reviewers consider the invitation against their own expertise, conflicts of interest and availability. I have revised the paper according to the referees' comments. Aug 12, 2019 · I have resubmitted a paper which was revised which needed minor revisions, but the status remains “Awaiting Reviewer Assignment” for 5 weeks. 26 awaiting AE recommendation 22. 04. However, they are not minor at all. Awaiting reviewer selection. What does this mean? Meaning of change from Awaiting Reviewer Assignment to Awaiting Reviewer Selection Minor Revision - A Minor revision should only be used for papers that have a clear contribution, and there are only small changes that need to be made to make the paper ready for publication. After reviewers return their reviews with recommendations, the Associate Editor handling the manuscript will write a meta review with a recommendation. Recently. What does this mean? Was the manuscript reviewed? I think the status should have changed to something like Awaiting Reviewer Scores before Awaiting EIC Decision. I don't know what this means and why it is taking so long. Mar 13, 2022 · After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. This change has occurred Dec 22, 2015 · Depending in the journal, of course, I consider one week is OK. ’ Choose Minor Revision when you feel the paper should be accepted after slight revisions. But until now, 5/17, the status are still "awaiting decision". After 28 days, it changed to "awaiting reviewer confirmation". This change has occurred Mar 13, 2022 · If the editorial management system (EMS) is distinguishing between the two, odds are "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" means the reviewers have not been invited yet, and "Awaiting Reviewer Confirmation" means the reviewers have not agreed to review the manuscript yet. Add additional templates. During this period, we got a chance to make minor revision. 3. 28 submitted 22. If you select ‘Decline to review’ ‘Unavailable’ ‘Not area of expertise’ the invitation to peer review will be re-moved however we would welcome recommendations of another expert reviewer (N: you may NOT forward this invitation to anyone else, as any recommendations must come via Dove Medical Press). However you can make it clear that the paper is likely to be accepted in the future. I submitted a manuscript to a Sage Journal almost 50 days ago. Now, from my earlier experience, I am worried uf they again take 5 months to Mar 11, 2021 · 5. I am really confused, can I contact the journal to explain this or should I just wait? Publish without revision, appropriate to select if you believe the manuscript is ready for publication. there were two reviewers, reviewer#1 said `The authors have made all the modifications indicated. The median time to review a revised version of a paper is a little over 2 months. Choose “Minor revision” If reviewers are no longer required and AE wants to QC some key revisions. This change has occurred Latest Articles. ‘Articles to Review’ (articles you have agreed to review and need action), ‘Reviews submitted’ (your review history: 6 As for a ‘Minor revision’ decision you should provide appropriate edited, comprehensive, coherent, non-conflicting comments to enable the author(s) to consider whether to re-submit. Should I reach out, or continue waiting? Thank your Oct 1, 2012 · In my field (chemistry), the practice is: for those journals that make a clear distinction between minor and major revision requests, “major revision” means that the paper will have to undergo further review after revision, usually by the same referees, while “minor revision” means that while changes should be made, no further reviewing is needed. , agreed or declined) their Reviewer invitation. As per my understanding, the status should be Awaiting EIC Decision. May 6, 2021 · After submitting the revised article for a week, a ADM was assigned and the status has changed to "awaiting reviewer invitation. This is a placeholder queue that does not require check these manuscripts periodically • Awaiting Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where reviewers have agreed to review, but have not submitted their review Overdue Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where Apr 5, 2021 · This has happened to me, and also as a reviewer, where an editor seek my comments on a paper after existing reviewers recommended minor revision; unfortunately for the authors, I recommended a reject. 4 Minor revision after second review, 22. I know the next stage is to Editor In chief. After six months, I received the reviews and was asked to do major revisions. So I thought it passed the associate editor's evaluation and now they were looking for reviewers. Once the requisite number of reviewers (generally 2 to 3) accept the invitation, the status changes to "Awaiting reviewer scores" which is the equivalent of "Under review. It is just guessing. " Does this mean that my manuscript needs to go through another round of review? I submit my manuscript to IEEE WCL on 4/14/2019 (Minor revision). The one exception is that accepting a paper after just minor revisions (e. , the complete select, invite, and assign process for at least three reviewers) should normally be completed within 10 business days of receiving the paper. Awaiting Editor Decision ASE AU — ASE sends a revision decision to AU (if a revision is required) within one week, normally a couple of workdays. The status is remained “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” since then. Also known as: with reviewers, with referees, under review, awaiting referee assignment, awaiting referee reports, awaiting reviewer scores, awaiting reviewer invitation , reviewers assigned, manuscript assigned to peer-reviewer/s (NPG) The initial selection of referees is usually comprised in the previous step. Last week, the status changed to Awaiting AE Recommendation. Interestingly, it is/was awaiting "reviewer" (not reviewers- in a plural form) recommendations. Aug 9, 2022 · After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. It is rare Minor Revision. • Choose Minor Revision when you feel the paper should be accepted after slight revisions. Nov 16, 2015 · I just submitted a revised paper to ScholarOne (minor revision). It has been over two weeks, but the status is still displayed as ‘Awaiting Admin Processing. Review was severely delayed: The review was • Assign Reviewers: Manuscripts awaiting responses from invited reviewers. Jun 9, 2021 · The paper was accepted with minor revision (two reviewers both recommended 'minor revision'). Most journals will try to catch this and either reject outright, or assign it to the same AE to handle. If possible, when declining, they might also suggest alternative reviewers. The status changed from "Awaiting Reviewer Reply" to "Awaiting Reviewer Scores", then stayed like that for a couple of weeks and now today the status is "Awaiting Reviewer Selection". " In the Action Column on the left, click on "View Abstract. Comments to Authors helps the authors improve their Aug 3, 2021 · Dear Team, First, thank you for running such a stunning forum. Reviewer reminders; Alternative reviewer suggestion for papers with overdue reviewers. See Also. This change has occurred Sep 6, 2021 · A major revision was submitted to a journal. Translation: 21. Review was slightly delayed: The review was submitted less than 7 days after the agreed review due date. I checked the link again after 3 days and I noticed that the date has changed to 19th of April (check the attached image) with the same status of "Review Complete". " Does it mean that my paper will go through another round of review with new reviewers? Oct 24, 2018 · You mention that the status is “Awaiting reviewer selection” under “Minor revision” and you also mention that you re-submitted your manuscript after major revisions. The status of the paper changed several times. However, after a few days, I got a desk reject notification. Dec 12, 2019 · I submitted my manuscript to a journal. 査読者の決定（返答待ち） Awaiting Reviewer Scores. This change has occurred Mar 10, 2020 · I submitted a manuscript to a journal that uses the ScholarOne system. Does this mean it got sent to reviewers or the editor is evaluating it? Any experience here? It’s an Elsevier journal. 'Major revisions' is one of the most common peer review decisions. This will help us the AE to find other reviewers in a timely manner. This change has occurred A first round of peer review might take up to 8 weeks easily and finding reviewers also needs time. So we sent query to the editor. You can register for free here: Peer Review Excellence. If the paper is not rejected, there are three possible recommendations: “accept (as is)”, “minor revision”, and “major revision”. Nov 12, 2020 · Do not put the blame onto the reviewer; try to correct the mis-communication on your end. If you are unable Editor of a journal asked for "Major Revision" for a submitted paper, after submitting revised paper it went for the review, after that the status shows "with Editor" for some time. To access the Review Form, a reviewer can either: • Use the hyperlink in the email notification sent by the Associate Editor after the reviewer agrees to accept the invitation. However, yesterday the status reverted back to "Awaiting Reviewer Selection". These types of revisions include correcting or adding more references, improving the quality The review appears too shallow; The comments do not match the decision proposed by the reviewer; The review is not objective and/or uses inappropriate language Decisions on Manuscripts. 1. Some journals have this weird category “reject with invitation to resubmit,” which functions as an alternative to “major revisions. Peer reviewers are given 2 weeks to submit their review of your article. Review is Conducted. The current status of the manuscript is ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ and has not changed for a month now. This change has occurred After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Time for the editor, the editorial staff, or even (possibly) one picky reviewer to check if your minor revision is okay. So, why has it returned to the referee(s) after last week's status? Jun 12, 2024 · Journal publications often go through a series of steps, from an initial acceptance to different rounds of revision. Awaiting recommendations: waiting for an editor to make a recommendation Recommendation can be "get another review" so it goes back to the review cycle. It is almost 5 months since resubmission. Any invitations to assignments will be listed in your Reviewer Dashboard under the ‘Invitations awaiting response’ tile (where you can agree or decline to review). Minor revisions should be verified by the AE and not sent back to the reviewers. I sent a paper to Journal of Cleaner Production and finally got minor revision after 6months. Respond to a Review Invitation. Once the review invitations are sent, the status changes to "Reviewers invited. I find "awaiting reviewer invitation" to be a slightly strange phrase, but taken at face value it seems to mean that they still have not even asked anyone to referee the paper, let alone found a referee, let alone gotten the report back from a referee! Nov 19, 2020 · After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Nov 19, 2020 · I submitted an article to a ScholarOne journal. As a peer reviewer, it is useful to learn about common reasons for a 'major revision' verdict. Furthermore, you can get inspired by sample peer 2 days ago · Peer review is an integral part of the publishing process, learn more about the peer review process, including: what the reviewer is looking for, the possible outcomes of peer review, common reasons for rejection, what to do if your manuscript is rejected, and how to respond to the reviewer comments. Aug 13, 2023 · In my case the system status showed a reviewer took a few weeks to accept the invitation, and then I waited for three months after that. Then I revised and resubmitted. On 4/26, the status on ScholarOne changed to awaiting decision. There is something of an air of mystery as to what actually happens to your manuscript once yo Apr 5, 2024 · In a paper we have re-submitted after revision I found some minor errors: For example one graph should be labeled g/ml but is labeled mg/ml accidentally. Although in my earlier submission of other papers in the same journal, in this time frame, my paper went into review process. If changes to the methodology is needed or simulations need to be run, then major Jun 20, 2023 · After the minor revision was uploaded, it has been showing "awaiting reviewer invitation". In general, a manuscript should not go through two rounds of major Before accepting a review invitation, consider the following points. Assess and Recommend. co. I am afraid that after this long period, the editor will reject the manuscript. " Reviewer Assignment: The status "awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editorial team is in the process of selecting and assigning new reviewers to evaluate your revised Aug 31, 2019 · After revision and resubmision, my manuscript status was "Awaiting AE recommendation. Aug 21, 2023 · 论文小修后await. The file of the manuscript with an overdue revision Nov 5, 2019 · However, finally he/she seems to have found the requisite number of reviewers and sent out review invitations to them. After you accept the invitation, you are expected to assess the paper and make one of the following Feb 17, 2022 · However, it was under review for 5 months. 4 awaiting reviewer score 22. Sep 10, 2020 · Receiving a "Major Revision" After undergoing a "Minor Revision" 4 "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" after "Acceptance with Minor Revision" 4. This change has occurred For example, minor revisions would not entail conducting a bunch of new analyses or overhauling part of the manuscript. May 1, 2021 · I submitted a manuscript to a journal by SAGE. After sending the query, the reviewers' comments came just within 4 days suggesting a minor revision. Because "reviewer10" is written, I would assume that the paper was reviewed by at least 6 reviewers. I did not Reviewer status and be badged as a training graduate on our reviewer selection system, making it more likely that you will be selected to review. Under ‘Reviewer Reports’, select ‘ Reviewer Invited – No Response Report ’. 28 submitted after minor revision 22. academicjournalpublishing. Feb 28, 2021 · My paper underwent a revision. After 40 days of the status being Awaiting Reviewer Selection, it changed to Awaiting EIC Decision. There is something of an air of mystery as to what actually happens to your manuscript once yo Jan 1, 2023 · I sent a paper to Journal of Cleaner Production and finally got minor revision after 6months. g. This means they only check whether a paper has sufficient reviewers every K month(s). Then, I have made all the necessary modifications and resubmitted. Your article has secured the minimum number of required reviewers. It is almost 5 months since resubmission, but the status has remained “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” since then. However, after we made the revisions, the manuscript status changed to "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation. otkeyy yvjsmb zuhpnj iukb lrm iudo nhxsr uccwlf awffzud houj